roc curve Search Results


90
MedCalc Software Ltd medcalc-comparison of roc curves
LncRNA HEIH has a high diagnostic efficacy in NSCLC patients. ( A ) The diagnostic efficacy of lncRNA HEIH and CEA in LUSC patients was evaluated by <t>ROC</t> curve analysis; ( B ) the diagnostic efficacy of lncRNA HEIH and CEA in LUAD patients was evaluated by ROC curve <t>analysis.</t> <t>MedCalc-comparison</t> of ROC curves was used to compare and analyze the area difference under the ROC curve.
Medcalc Comparison Of Roc Curves, supplied by MedCalc Software Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/roc+curve/pmc08841735-165-2-0?v=MedCalc+Software+Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
medcalc-comparison of roc curves - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MedCalc Software Ltd receiver operating characteristic (roc) curve
LncRNA HEIH has a high diagnostic efficacy in NSCLC patients. ( A ) The diagnostic efficacy of lncRNA HEIH and CEA in LUSC patients was evaluated by <t>ROC</t> curve analysis; ( B ) the diagnostic efficacy of lncRNA HEIH and CEA in LUAD patients was evaluated by ROC curve <t>analysis.</t> <t>MedCalc-comparison</t> of ROC curves was used to compare and analyze the area difference under the ROC curve.
Receiver Operating Characteristic (Roc) Curve, supplied by MedCalc Software Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/roc+curve/10__1213_slash_ane__0b013e3181f4e82e-81-18-27?v=MedCalc+Software+Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
receiver operating characteristic (roc) curve - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MedCalc Software Ltd web-based calculator roc curves
LncRNA HEIH has a high diagnostic efficacy in NSCLC patients. ( A ) The diagnostic efficacy of lncRNA HEIH and CEA in LUSC patients was evaluated by <t>ROC</t> curve analysis; ( B ) the diagnostic efficacy of lncRNA HEIH and CEA in LUAD patients was evaluated by ROC curve <t>analysis.</t> <t>MedCalc-comparison</t> of ROC curves was used to compare and analyze the area difference under the ROC curve.
Web Based Calculator Roc Curves, supplied by MedCalc Software Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/roc+curve/10__1158_slash_1078___0432__ccr___09___3304-79-6-11?v=MedCalc+Software+Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
web-based calculator roc curves - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MedCalc Software Ltd auc of the roc curve
<t>ROC</t> curves of every continuous variable. (A) , primary tumor CT signs. (B) , texture features. The area under the curve <t>(AUC)</t> represented the accuracy of predicting for occult PM.
Auc Of The Roc Curve, supplied by MedCalc Software Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/roc+curve/pmc09753569-155-9-21?v=MedCalc+Software+Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
auc of the roc curve - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MedCalc Software Ltd roc curve analysis component
<t>ROC</t> curves of every continuous variable. (A) , primary tumor CT signs. (B) , texture features. The area under the curve <t>(AUC)</t> represented the accuracy of predicting for occult PM.
Roc Curve Analysis Component, supplied by MedCalc Software Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/roc+curve/pmc05879079-76-7-12?v=MedCalc+Software+Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
roc curve analysis component - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MedCalc Software Ltd roc curve and auc value calculation
<t>ROC</t> curves of every continuous variable. (A) , primary tumor CT signs. (B) , texture features. The area under the curve <t>(AUC)</t> represented the accuracy of predicting for occult PM.
Roc Curve And Auc Value Calculation, supplied by MedCalc Software Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/roc+curve/10__1097_slash_md__0000000000016511-78-1-17?v=MedCalc+Software+Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
roc curve and auc value calculation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MedCalc Software Ltd roc curve analysis and calculation of test sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value
<t>ROC</t> curves of every continuous variable. (A) , primary tumor CT signs. (B) , texture features. The area under the curve <t>(AUC)</t> represented the accuracy of predicting for occult PM.
Roc Curve Analysis And Calculation Of Test Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive And Negative Predictive Value, supplied by MedCalc Software Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/roc+curve/pmc03420892-125-6-17?v=MedCalc+Software+Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
roc curve analysis and calculation of test sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc receiver operating characteristic curve (roc curve)
<t>ROC</t> curves of every continuous variable. (A) , primary tumor CT signs. (B) , texture features. The area under the curve <t>(AUC)</t> represented the accuracy of predicting for occult PM.
Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (Roc Curve), supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/roc+curve/pmc09641235-174-4-11?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
receiver operating characteristic curve (roc curve) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MedCalc Software Ltd roc values calculated as the area under the curve (auc)
<t>ROC</t> curves of every continuous variable. (A) , primary tumor CT signs. (B) , texture features. The area under the curve <t>(AUC)</t> represented the accuracy of predicting for occult PM.
Roc Values Calculated As The Area Under The Curve (Auc), supplied by MedCalc Software Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/roc+curve/pmc02442252-67-9-12?v=MedCalc+Software+Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
roc values calculated as the area under the curve (auc) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MedCalc Software Ltd roc curve prediction model
<t>ROC</t> curves of every continuous variable. (A) , primary tumor CT signs. (B) , texture features. The area under the curve <t>(AUC)</t> represented the accuracy of predicting for occult PM.
Roc Curve Prediction Model, supplied by MedCalc Software Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/roc+curve/pmc10250727-76-8-15?v=MedCalc+Software+Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
roc curve prediction model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MedCalc Software Ltd roc and auroc curves
Prognostic feature analysis of three miRNA cluster candidates in BCa patients. The Kaplan–Meier survival curves show overall survival outcomes of miRNA cluster candidates. a mir-200c/mir-141, b mir-216a/mir-217, c mir-15b/mir-16-2 according to their expression in high and low-risk patient groups (black: low expression; red: high expression). <t>The</t> <t>ROC</t> curve showing diagnostic values of miRNA cluster candidates, d mir-200c/mir-141, e mir-15b/mir-16-2, and f mir-216a/mir-217. The ROC and <t>AUROC</t> curves are generated through MedCalc software
Roc And Auroc Curves, supplied by MedCalc Software Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/roc+curve/pmc09279521-105-3-8?v=MedCalc+Software+Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
roc and auroc curves - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MedCalc Software Ltd roc curve medcalc software package version 7.3.0.0
<t>(A)</t> <t>Venn</t> diagram analysis was carried out to identify the intersection of phenotypic/functional biomarkers amongst NV(day0), PV(day30-45), PV(year1-9) and PV(year10-11) and select those common attributes between PV(day30-45) and PV(year1-9), considered biomarkers of protection. Detailed Venn Diagram report is provided in the . (B) The performance indicators (cut-off, accuracy, sensitivity-Se and specificity-Sp) for the ten selected common biomarkers (eEfCD4, EMCD4, CMCD19, EMCD8, IFNCD4, IL-5CD8, TNFCD4, IFNCD8, TNFCD8 and IL-5CD4) are provided in the inserted table. (C) Heatmap analysis was carried out to illustrate the profile of phenotypic/functional biomarkers common at PV(day30-45) and PV(year1-9) as well as the mean index calculated considering all 10 phenotypic/functional biomarkers together and demonstrate the proportion (%) of volunteers presenting low (Green), median (Black) or high (Red) YF-Ag/CC index. Histograms were constructed to highlight the frequency of volunteers above the median YF-Ag/CC index (Red Curves). (D) Scatter plot were built to demonstrate the sensitivity (Red Circles) and specificity (Green Circles) of the mean index of 10 phenotypic/functional biomarkers, using the cut-off edge (Mean Index = 1.3) provided by the <t>ROC</t> curve analysis. (E) Memory diagram were constructed using the defined cut-off for phenotypic/functional biomarkers, the memory status was defined for each subject, considering the phenotypic/functional (Mean Index of 10 biomarkers >1.3) and PRNT (>2.9 Log mIU/mL, according to Simões et al., 2012). Column statistics were used to calculate the proportion of subjects displaying distinct status of resultant memory, referred as none, phenotypic/functional biomarkers—P&F, PRNT and both. (F) The resultant memory for the 10 phenotypic/functional biomarkers and PRNT was displayed on bar charts. Significant differences at p<0.05 (Chi-square test) of resultant status amongst study groups were represented by letters “a”, b”, “c” and “d” in comparison to NV(day0), PV(day30-45), PV(year1-9) and PV(year10-11), respectively.
Roc Curve Medcalc Software Package Version 7.3.0.0, supplied by MedCalc Software Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/roc+curve/pmc05991646-72-11-13?v=MedCalc+Software+Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
roc curve medcalc software package version 7.3.0.0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


LncRNA HEIH has a high diagnostic efficacy in NSCLC patients. ( A ) The diagnostic efficacy of lncRNA HEIH and CEA in LUSC patients was evaluated by ROC curve analysis; ( B ) the diagnostic efficacy of lncRNA HEIH and CEA in LUAD patients was evaluated by ROC curve analysis. MedCalc-comparison of ROC curves was used to compare and analyze the area difference under the ROC curve.

Journal: Cancer Management and Research

Article Title: High Expression of lncRNA HEIH is Helpful in the Diagnosis of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Predicts Poor Prognosis

doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S320965

Figure Lengend Snippet: LncRNA HEIH has a high diagnostic efficacy in NSCLC patients. ( A ) The diagnostic efficacy of lncRNA HEIH and CEA in LUSC patients was evaluated by ROC curve analysis; ( B ) the diagnostic efficacy of lncRNA HEIH and CEA in LUAD patients was evaluated by ROC curve analysis. MedCalc-comparison of ROC curves was used to compare and analyze the area difference under the ROC curve.

Article Snippet: MedCalc-comparison of ROC curves showed that the area under ROC curve of lncRNA HEIH was significantly higher than that of CEA ( P = 0.0011; 95% CI = 0.057–0.228), indicating that lncRNA HEIH had a higher diagnostic efficacy than CEA for LUAD.

Techniques: Diagnostic Assay, Comparison

ROC curves of every continuous variable. (A) , primary tumor CT signs. (B) , texture features. The area under the curve (AUC) represented the accuracy of predicting for occult PM.

Journal: Frontiers in Oncology

Article Title: Practical nomogram based on comprehensive CT texture analysis to preoperatively predict peritoneal occult metastasis of gastric cancer patients

doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.882584

Figure Lengend Snippet: ROC curves of every continuous variable. (A) , primary tumor CT signs. (B) , texture features. The area under the curve (AUC) represented the accuracy of predicting for occult PM.

Article Snippet: The efficiency of the models was tested by the AUC of the ROC curve and compared by the DeLong test in MedCalc.

Techniques:

 ROC  curves parameters of different models.

Journal: Frontiers in Oncology

Article Title: Practical nomogram based on comprehensive CT texture analysis to preoperatively predict peritoneal occult metastasis of gastric cancer patients

doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.882584

Figure Lengend Snippet: ROC curves parameters of different models.

Article Snippet: The efficiency of the models was tested by the AUC of the ROC curve and compared by the DeLong test in MedCalc.

Techniques:

Comparison of  ROC  curves  AUC  areas of different models.

Journal: Frontiers in Oncology

Article Title: Practical nomogram based on comprehensive CT texture analysis to preoperatively predict peritoneal occult metastasis of gastric cancer patients

doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.882584

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of ROC curves AUC areas of different models.

Article Snippet: The efficiency of the models was tested by the AUC of the ROC curve and compared by the DeLong test in MedCalc.

Techniques: Comparison

Prognostic feature analysis of three miRNA cluster candidates in BCa patients. The Kaplan–Meier survival curves show overall survival outcomes of miRNA cluster candidates. a mir-200c/mir-141, b mir-216a/mir-217, c mir-15b/mir-16-2 according to their expression in high and low-risk patient groups (black: low expression; red: high expression). The ROC curve showing diagnostic values of miRNA cluster candidates, d mir-200c/mir-141, e mir-15b/mir-16-2, and f mir-216a/mir-217. The ROC and AUROC curves are generated through MedCalc software

Journal: 3 Biotech

Article Title: Diagnostic and prognostic potential clustered miRNAs in bladder cancer

doi: 10.1007/s13205-022-03225-z

Figure Lengend Snippet: Prognostic feature analysis of three miRNA cluster candidates in BCa patients. The Kaplan–Meier survival curves show overall survival outcomes of miRNA cluster candidates. a mir-200c/mir-141, b mir-216a/mir-217, c mir-15b/mir-16-2 according to their expression in high and low-risk patient groups (black: low expression; red: high expression). The ROC curve showing diagnostic values of miRNA cluster candidates, d mir-200c/mir-141, e mir-15b/mir-16-2, and f mir-216a/mir-217. The ROC and AUROC curves are generated through MedCalc software

Article Snippet: The ROC and AUROC curves are generated through MedCalc software

Techniques: Expressing, Diagnostic Assay, Generated, Software

(A) Venn diagram analysis was carried out to identify the intersection of phenotypic/functional biomarkers amongst NV(day0), PV(day30-45), PV(year1-9) and PV(year10-11) and select those common attributes between PV(day30-45) and PV(year1-9), considered biomarkers of protection. Detailed Venn Diagram report is provided in the . (B) The performance indicators (cut-off, accuracy, sensitivity-Se and specificity-Sp) for the ten selected common biomarkers (eEfCD4, EMCD4, CMCD19, EMCD8, IFNCD4, IL-5CD8, TNFCD4, IFNCD8, TNFCD8 and IL-5CD4) are provided in the inserted table. (C) Heatmap analysis was carried out to illustrate the profile of phenotypic/functional biomarkers common at PV(day30-45) and PV(year1-9) as well as the mean index calculated considering all 10 phenotypic/functional biomarkers together and demonstrate the proportion (%) of volunteers presenting low (Green), median (Black) or high (Red) YF-Ag/CC index. Histograms were constructed to highlight the frequency of volunteers above the median YF-Ag/CC index (Red Curves). (D) Scatter plot were built to demonstrate the sensitivity (Red Circles) and specificity (Green Circles) of the mean index of 10 phenotypic/functional biomarkers, using the cut-off edge (Mean Index = 1.3) provided by the ROC curve analysis. (E) Memory diagram were constructed using the defined cut-off for phenotypic/functional biomarkers, the memory status was defined for each subject, considering the phenotypic/functional (Mean Index of 10 biomarkers >1.3) and PRNT (>2.9 Log mIU/mL, according to Simões et al., 2012). Column statistics were used to calculate the proportion of subjects displaying distinct status of resultant memory, referred as none, phenotypic/functional biomarkers—P&F, PRNT and both. (F) The resultant memory for the 10 phenotypic/functional biomarkers and PRNT was displayed on bar charts. Significant differences at p<0.05 (Chi-square test) of resultant status amongst study groups were represented by letters “a”, b”, “c” and “d” in comparison to NV(day0), PV(day30-45), PV(year1-9) and PV(year10-11), respectively.

Journal: PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Article Title: Multi-parameter approach to evaluate the timing of memory status after 17DD-YF primary vaccination

doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006462

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Venn diagram analysis was carried out to identify the intersection of phenotypic/functional biomarkers amongst NV(day0), PV(day30-45), PV(year1-9) and PV(year10-11) and select those common attributes between PV(day30-45) and PV(year1-9), considered biomarkers of protection. Detailed Venn Diagram report is provided in the . (B) The performance indicators (cut-off, accuracy, sensitivity-Se and specificity-Sp) for the ten selected common biomarkers (eEfCD4, EMCD4, CMCD19, EMCD8, IFNCD4, IL-5CD8, TNFCD4, IFNCD8, TNFCD8 and IL-5CD4) are provided in the inserted table. (C) Heatmap analysis was carried out to illustrate the profile of phenotypic/functional biomarkers common at PV(day30-45) and PV(year1-9) as well as the mean index calculated considering all 10 phenotypic/functional biomarkers together and demonstrate the proportion (%) of volunteers presenting low (Green), median (Black) or high (Red) YF-Ag/CC index. Histograms were constructed to highlight the frequency of volunteers above the median YF-Ag/CC index (Red Curves). (D) Scatter plot were built to demonstrate the sensitivity (Red Circles) and specificity (Green Circles) of the mean index of 10 phenotypic/functional biomarkers, using the cut-off edge (Mean Index = 1.3) provided by the ROC curve analysis. (E) Memory diagram were constructed using the defined cut-off for phenotypic/functional biomarkers, the memory status was defined for each subject, considering the phenotypic/functional (Mean Index of 10 biomarkers >1.3) and PRNT (>2.9 Log mIU/mL, according to Simões et al., 2012). Column statistics were used to calculate the proportion of subjects displaying distinct status of resultant memory, referred as none, phenotypic/functional biomarkers—P&F, PRNT and both. (F) The resultant memory for the 10 phenotypic/functional biomarkers and PRNT was displayed on bar charts. Significant differences at p<0.05 (Chi-square test) of resultant status amongst study groups were represented by letters “a”, b”, “c” and “d” in comparison to NV(day0), PV(day30-45), PV(year1-9) and PV(year10-11), respectively.

Article Snippet: Additional analysis was carried out employing Venn diagram ( http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/ ), ROC curve (MedCalc software package, Version 7.3.0.0), heatmap (R Project for Statistical Computing Version 3.0.1) and decision tree J48 algorithm (present in WEKA software version 3.6.11).

Techniques: Functional Assay, Construct, Comparison

(A) Decision tree analysis was carried out to identify root attributes [Ellipses] for phenotypic/functional (P&F) biomarkers amongst NV(day0)&PV(year10-11) [white rectangle] and PV(day30-45)&PV(year1-9) [black rectangle], considered biomarkers to discriminate unprotected from protected subjects. Leave-one-out-cross-validation analysis (LOOCV) was employed to minimize biased performance estimates by using all data set for decision tree model fitting. EMCD8 and IL-5CD4 were selected as major phenotypic and functional 17DD-YF Memory-related biomarkers, respectively. (B) Heatmaps were built, taking the mean index of the top-two phenotypic/functional biomarkers (EMCD8 & IL-5CD4) and demonstrating the proportion (%) of volunteers ranging from low (White) to high (Gray) YF-Ag/CC index. A scatter plot was constructed to show the sensitivity (Gray Circle) and specificity (White Circle) of the top-two biomarkers, employing the cut-off edge (Mean Index = 1.3) provided by the ROC curve analysis. (C) Resultant memory status was defined for each subject, considering the top-two biomarkers (Mean Index >1.3) and PRNT (>2.9 Log mIU/mL, according to Simões et al., 2012). Column statistics were used to calculate the proportion of subjects displaying differing categories of resultant memory, referred as none, top-two biomarkers—P&F, PRNT and both. (D) Pie charts illustrated the overall resultant memory status within each category, as determined by the top-two biomarkers and PRNT. Significant differences at p<0.05 (Chi-square test) of resultant memory status amongst study groups were represented by letters “a”, b”, “c” and “d” in comparison to NV(day0), PV(day30-45), PV(year1-9) and PV(year10-11), respectively.

Journal: PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Article Title: Multi-parameter approach to evaluate the timing of memory status after 17DD-YF primary vaccination

doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006462

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Decision tree analysis was carried out to identify root attributes [Ellipses] for phenotypic/functional (P&F) biomarkers amongst NV(day0)&PV(year10-11) [white rectangle] and PV(day30-45)&PV(year1-9) [black rectangle], considered biomarkers to discriminate unprotected from protected subjects. Leave-one-out-cross-validation analysis (LOOCV) was employed to minimize biased performance estimates by using all data set for decision tree model fitting. EMCD8 and IL-5CD4 were selected as major phenotypic and functional 17DD-YF Memory-related biomarkers, respectively. (B) Heatmaps were built, taking the mean index of the top-two phenotypic/functional biomarkers (EMCD8 & IL-5CD4) and demonstrating the proportion (%) of volunteers ranging from low (White) to high (Gray) YF-Ag/CC index. A scatter plot was constructed to show the sensitivity (Gray Circle) and specificity (White Circle) of the top-two biomarkers, employing the cut-off edge (Mean Index = 1.3) provided by the ROC curve analysis. (C) Resultant memory status was defined for each subject, considering the top-two biomarkers (Mean Index >1.3) and PRNT (>2.9 Log mIU/mL, according to Simões et al., 2012). Column statistics were used to calculate the proportion of subjects displaying differing categories of resultant memory, referred as none, top-two biomarkers—P&F, PRNT and both. (D) Pie charts illustrated the overall resultant memory status within each category, as determined by the top-two biomarkers and PRNT. Significant differences at p<0.05 (Chi-square test) of resultant memory status amongst study groups were represented by letters “a”, b”, “c” and “d” in comparison to NV(day0), PV(day30-45), PV(year1-9) and PV(year10-11), respectively.

Article Snippet: Additional analysis was carried out employing Venn diagram ( http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/ ), ROC curve (MedCalc software package, Version 7.3.0.0), heatmap (R Project for Statistical Computing Version 3.0.1) and decision tree J48 algorithm (present in WEKA software version 3.6.11).

Techniques: Functional Assay, Biomarker Discovery, Construct, Comparison